3D models of Australopithecus afarensis suggest the muscular adaptations that made modern humans better runners

Humans evolved for distance running – but ancestor ‘Lucy’ didn’t go far or fast

Ancient human relatives ran on two legs, like modern humans, but at a much slower pace, suggest 3D computer simulations of Australopithecus afarensis1 – a small hominin that lived more than three million years ago.

The analysis offers a detailed snapshot of the hominin’s running speed and the muscular adaptations that enabled modern humans to run long distances, says Herman Pontzer, an evolutionary anthropologist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. “It’s a very thorough approach,” he says. The findings were published this week in Current Biology.

A. afarensis walked upright on two legs, making its fossils a favourite for researchers looking to unpick how bipedalism evolved in the human lineage. But few studies have explored the hominin’s running ability because it requires more than studying fossilized footprints and bones, says study co-author Karl Bates, an evolutionary biomechanics researcher at the University of Liverpool, UK.

A slow ape

Bates and his colleagues created a 3D digital model of the ‘Lucy’ skeleton – a near-complete 3.2-million-year-old A. afarensis specimen discovered in Ethiopia half a century ago. They used the muscular features of modern apes and the surface area of Lucy’s bones to estimate the ancient hominin’s muscle mass. The researchers then used a simulator to make their Lucy model ‘run’ and compared its performance with that of a digital model of a modern human.

The simulations showed that Lucy could run on two legs, despite lacking the lengthened Achilles tendon and shortened muscle fibres that are thought to benefit endurance running in modern humans. But speed wasn’t Lucy’s strength: she could reach a maximum of only around five metres per second, even after the researchers remodelled her with human muscles. By contrast, the human model ran at roughly 8 metres per second. Even when the researchers removed body size from their modelling, Lucy’s running still lagged behind that of modern humans, suggesting that her physical proportions were the main culprit. “Even if you jack up all the muscles, she was still slower,” says Bates.

Enjoying our latest content?
Login or create an account to continue

  • Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
  • Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research
Access through your institution

or

Sign in or create an account Continue with Google Continue with ORCiD

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-04194-4

This story originally appeared on: Nature - Author:Gemma Conroy