Shielding science from politics: how Joe Biden’s research integrity drive is faring
Representatives of US whistleblower organisations deliver their verdict on a strategy to protect federal scientists and their research
Hear Evi Emmenegger describe her experience of whistleblowing, and an update on science integrity measures in the US.
Download MP3 See transcriptIn January 2022 the Biden administration announced its long-awaited strategy to safeguard scientific integrity across US federal research facilities and agencies.
But 16 months on, do researchers working in those organisations feel better protected than they did under the administration led by Joe Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump?
The Union of Concerned Scientists, a US non-profit and advocacy organisation based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has tracked more than 200 examples where scientific decision-making processes were politicised during the four-year Trump administration, compared to 98 under the 2001-9 presidency of George W Bush.
In the second episode of this six-part Working Scientist podcast series about freedom and safety in science, Jacob Carter, research director at the union’s centre for science and democracy, joins Lauren Kurtz, executive director of the US Climate Science Legal Defence Fund, to describe the impact of the Biden strategy in empowering scientist whistleblowers to speak out.
“Don’t punish the people who do come forward,” says Kurtz. “Even if their claims are found to be not a true violation or there was a misunderstanding or something, it’s imperative to not punish people who came forth with good faith claims.”
Finally, Evi Emmenegger, who studies aquatic animal pathogens at a US federal research facility, describes what happened after she raised concerns to her supervisors about contaminated waste water being released in nearby wetlands over a six-month period.
Each episode in this series concludes with a follow-up sponsored slot from the International Science Council about how it is exploring freedom, responsibility and safety in science.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01396-0
Paid content: International Science Council (ISC)
The International Science Council is exploring freedom and responsibility in science. What are the responsibilities of scientists in the twenty-first century? How can scientists be protected from threats to scientific freedom?
We will hear perspectives on freedom and responsibility from the global scientific community.
In episode 2, Lidia Borrell-Damián, Secretary General of Science Europe, argues for scientists’ right to autonomy and highlights the many ways in which it can be infringed.
And Willem Halffman, Associate Professor at Radboud University, explains how autonomy and scientific responsibility are intimately connected.
Find out more about this type of paid content.
This story originally appeared on: Nature - Author:Levy, Adam
